The big news of last week for those receiving Social Security benefits was the announcement of a 1.7% benefit increase for 2013, thanks to a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) linked to inflation.
These COLAs began in 1975, when Congress tied annual benefit adjustments to inflation. Each year when there’s inflation, benefits are increased to keep up with the rising cost of food, gas, health care, and other expenses. But some are calling the meager 1.7% increase “an insult,” and it has (again) raised questions about how the increases are calculated.
Currently, the Social Security COLA formula is based on an inflation measure specifically designed to reflect costs for “Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers.” This measure, called the CPI-W, assumes a “basket of goods” that includes some things seniors buy – including food, energy, apparel, transportation, and some things they typically don’t, such as cars and new electronics. This means the CPI-W often does not accurately reflect the costs seniors face.
As MarketWatch chief economist Irwin Kellner points out:
The price indexes that the government uses also include such items as cars, computers and cell phones, the prices for which are steady or even falling. Thus these indexes do not give enough weight to items seniors actually buy
For example, last year food rose 4.7%, apparel 4.6%, gasoline 10.3% and health care 3.5%. As you can see, these increases are well above the 1.7% COLA seniors and disabled vets will receive for 2013.
Fortunately, there’s an easy solution. Congress could change the COLA formula from the CPI-W to a new consumer price index developed specifically to reflect costs faced by elderly Americans – the CPI-E. The CPI-E (“Elderly”) would more accurately reflect costs for health insurance, hospitals, prescription drugs, nursing care and other expenses primarily incurred by seniors. In 2005, Washington Senator Maria Cantwell introduced a bill to establish a consumer price index for the elderly that would be used to calculate Social Security benefits, but it did not pass.
Instead of using a CPI based on a “basket of goods” that does not represent the purchasing habits of seniors, Congress should require the Social Security Administration to calculate benefit increases based on a CPI-E, which would better help seniors keep up with rising costs.
- Leave a Reply
More To Read
August 10, 2026
Buy, Borrow, Die: How tax codes gut community well-being to line pockets of the wealthy
We are long overdue for a tax code that requires the ultra-wealthy to pay what they owe.
July 30, 2026
What the Millionaires Tax would mean for Washington
We’re not paying the benefits of economic growth forward like we used to. The Millionaires Tax can change that.
July 9, 2026
How will the Millionaires Tax impact us?
The Millionaires Tax adds critical revenue to our state budget and starts to rebalance our upside-down tax code.
