Some of you may remember the trickle down economic theory popularized during the Reagan presidency, when the top income tax bracket dropped precipitously from 70% in 1981 to an all time low of 28% between 1988 and 1990. (For the record, during the Clinton administration the rate was raised to 39.6%; under George W. Bush it went down to 35%.)
Turns out, “trickle” is the right word to use, because if you’re like me, you aren’t benefiting from those tax cuts. 71% of the benefits go to the top 1% of tax payers, estimated to save each of them more than $56,000 per year in 2010. “Fine”, you say, “some people got themselves a tax break, good for them.” But the fact is those tax cuts were only possible because of increased taxes on working families.
Here’s how it happened: Early in Reagan’s presidency, for the first time ever, Social Security and Medicare taxes were raised above the level needed to pay benefits to current recipients. The ostensible reason was to build up the “Social Security trust fund” to cover the retirement of the baby boomers. Payroll tax rates increased from 5.08% (paid by workers and matched by employers) to 5.7% in 1984 and 6.2% in 1990. Medicaid rates went from 1.05% in 1980 to 1.3% in 1981 and up to 1.45 % in 1986, which is where they have remained.
But instead of investing the trust fund to make our economy and workforce more productive – for example, in modern transportation infrastructure, new energy efficiencies, and education – the “Social Security surplus” was used to fund tax breaks for the highest of high incomes. Today, a mountain of federal debt and a “great recession” are just two of the sad legacies of the failed “slash tax and borrow” fiscal policies of the Reagan-Bush (and Bush) years.
It’s high time we roll back those tax breaks and bring equity back to our tax system. Economists across the country – in Washington, California, New York, Arizona and Illinois to name a few – are calling for increased taxes to kick-start our economy by making public investments in infrastructure that will long-term economic growth, like education, transportation, energy and health care.
- Leave a Reply
More To Read
August 10, 2026
Buy, Borrow, Die: How tax codes gut community well-being to line pockets of the wealthy
We are long overdue for a tax code that requires the ultra-wealthy to pay what they owe.
July 30, 2026
What the Millionaires Tax would mean for Washington
We’re not paying the benefits of economic growth forward like we used to. The Millionaires Tax can change that.
July 9, 2026
How will the Millionaires Tax impact us?
The Millionaires Tax adds critical revenue to our state budget and starts to rebalance our upside-down tax code.