Update: The pdf version of the WPC brief cites a 2004 study by the National Federation of Independent Business to back up its claims about provision of paid family leave by small business. The NFIB study states:
“Just 12 percent of all small employers have policy regarding employees who request time off for a serious family illness, a birth, a birth, or an adoption.” (p.2)
So for the vast majority of workers at the firms surveyed by the NFIB, there is no guarantee of receiving time off for a significant life event like a birth or adoption, and there’s no job protection either.
Let’s try that idea out on health care to see how it sounds. If only 12% of employers had written policies on health care insurance for their workers, would it be reasonable to claim that two-thirds of workers have health care benefits?
It doesn’t work with family leave benefits either.
- Leave a Reply
More To Read
August 10, 2026
Buy, Borrow, Die: How tax codes gut community well-being to line pockets of the wealthy
We are long overdue for a tax code that requires the ultra-wealthy to pay what they owe.
July 30, 2026
What the Millionaires Tax would mean for Washington
We’re not paying the benefits of economic growth forward like we used to. The Millionaires Tax can change that.
July 9, 2026
How will the Millionaires Tax impact us?
The Millionaires Tax adds critical revenue to our state budget and starts to rebalance our upside-down tax code.